Wednesday, February 25, 2026

1 hour 48 minutes of Trump…and zero solutions

Here's the bottom line: We don't have to accept this.
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Dear Danielle,

Last night he talked for 1 hour and 48 minutes.

And as always, he said a lot and somehow still nothing at all.

He talked about the so-called "hoax" of affordability. He talked about the stock market and about tariffs. He claimed that America is "winning," that we're the "hottest country in the world," and that everyone's income is "way up."

He lied, exaggerated, and used fear and shame when speaking to the American people about the state of our union.

And of course, he talked about himself.

But as I listened, I didn't hear one thing that actually matters to most working families.

On health care: He kicked 15 million people off insurance, cut $800 billion from health care, and bailed out Argentina's Wall Street investors instead.

On child care and housing: Not a word. Yet families struggle every day to afford daycare, mortgages, and rent.

On immigration and ICE: He tripled ICE's budget, terrorizing communities, killing people, by cutting funding for Americans' health care. What ICE is doing is incredibly unpopular, despite how much he boasts about it while stoking hateful rhetoric about immigrants.

On corruption: Trump's family crypto company has made over $1 billion this term alone. Talk about draining the swamp.

On trade: He called the Supreme Court's ruling about his tariffs being illegal "disappointing." What's "disappointing" is that he stole money out of people's pockets by forcing families to pay more than $1,700 each on tariff price increases. He didn't mention that part, though.

Trump can spin, lie, and give himself as many standing ovations as he wants (and at 1 hour and 48 minutes, he certainly did.) to try to convince us we're better off under his leadership. But all we have to do is look around.

Groceries are more expensive. Tariffs have stolen thousands from you. Our communities are not any safer. And Trump's family and their billionaire friends have been cashing in.

Here's the bottom line: We don't have to accept this.

I'm committed to using every tool I have to fight this corrupt administration — and to push the Democratic party to fight harder for working people with bold, structural economic change and a clear, forceful rebuttal to Trump's lies and failed policies.

As for you, I hope you'll join me in holding onto the belief that better things are possible — and resolving to stay in this fight.

Please consider making a contribution to help us fight back against Trump's failed policies and fight FOR big, structural change for working families.

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

 
fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

Said with a smirk

About the Supreme Court's recent tariff decision
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle,

Donald Trump illegally stole your money — and you are entitled to get it back.

The Supreme Court recently ruled that the chaotic tariffs he put in place last year — the tariffs that he dangled in front of other countries to make them bend the knee, made the prices of goods skyrocket, and enabled large corporations to increase prices for consumers to cover the costs — were illegal.

Yes: The Supreme Court actually stepped up and actually applied the law.

Now, that means we've got to work out a way to get the $160 billion in revenue that the federal government got from these tariffs back into the hands of the people it was taken from. As a reminder, families have paid more than $1,700 each on tariff costs. 90% of the costs of these tariffs were borne by American families and businesses.

But how did the Trump administration respond? Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is in charge of figuring this out, smirked when asked about what's going to happen to this money and said, "'I got a feeling the American people aren't going to see it."

What, does he think if the government can't keep this money that it should just go to a handful of giant corporations? This would give corporations two wins: First when they passed those tariff costs along to consumers, and then again through a refund back to the corporations.

I got a feeling the American people want their money back. And I'm going to bang every drum and shake every table I can find to ensure this money gets refunded to American families and small businesses — not giant corporations.

Add your name to keep up the pressure, Danielle: It's time for American families to get their money back from the government's illegal tariffs, and it's up to the Trump administration to make that happen.

ADD YOUR NAME

It's not that hard: When somebody takes money from you illegally, that's called stealing in the United States. The American people are entitled to the money that was stolen from them, plain and simple.

I'm going to keep up the fight on this.

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

 
fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.

Saturday, February 21, 2026

AI, Crypto, and AIPAC ads in Illinois

Voters have a choice that these special interests are trying to distort
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle,

Dark money groups are spending MILLIONS of dollars to handpick your representatives in Congress.

We defeated them in New Jersey when Analilia Mejia — who doesn't take a cent of corporate PAC money — won the primary in New Jersey's 11th District earlier this month, but now the dark money groups are back.

Now look at what's happening in these House races in Illinois.

The primary election is on March 17 — and voters are getting bombarded with political ads from groups like "FairShake", "Elect Chicago Women", and "Affordable Chicago Now".

The ads are in support of the opponents of Robert Peters in Illinois' 2nd district, Junaid Ahmed in Illinois' 8th district, and Daniel Biss in Illinois' 9th district.

But who's funding these ads?

AIPAC, crypto billionaires, and the AI industry. Organizations looking to handpick representatives who will pay to play.

And they are hiding their motives from voters. Their ads don't even mention the special interests they really represent.

These groups are pushing for politicians in Congress who will go to work every day for THEIR interests — not for the interests of the voters who actually live in the districts they're blanketing with ads.

Voters have a choice that these special interests are trying to distort: We can either elect fighters who will unrig this broken system or pick more of the same failed status quo.

It's time to fight back and show that working people are more powerful than special interests. So please, if you can, split a donation of $100 or anything you can between Robert Peters, Junaid Ahmed, Daniel Biss, and our movement to fight back against these special interests and send real, progressive champions to Congress.

I've endorsed these three candidates because they don't take a dime of corporate PAC money, and they'll actually fight to lower costs for your family instead of fighting for AIPAC, crypto billionaires, and the AI industry's bottom lines.

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

 
fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.

Friday, February 20, 2026

CVS, CVS, CVS, and CVS.

One giant company is usually in charge of the whole supply chain
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle, imagine you wake up with a headache.

It's a fairly common experience (especially these days), and one that shouldn't accidentally put you in the middle of a web of corporate greed.

But it does.

Let's say you go to the doctor. And it's Oak Street Health because that's close by. Well, Oak Street Health is owned by CVS. That's right — your doctor is owned by CVS.

And let's say that doctor prescribes you medicine. So you go to your pharmacy, CVS.

That medicine is covered by your insurance, Aetna. And who owns Aetna? Right again, CVS.

But wait, there's a middleman between your pharmacy and insurance company that helps you negotiate prices to lower costs: CVS Caremark. Who owns the middleman? You got it — CVS.

CVS may own your pharmacy. CVS may own your doctor. CVS may own your insurance company. CVS may own the middleman between your insurance company and your pharmacy. One giant company is in charge of the whole supply chain, and you better believe they are taking a cut every step of the way. That means prices get higher and higher, and patients left paying more and more.

To fix our country's inflating health care crisis, we have to break up big medicine once and for all. By doing that, we will lower health care costs for you and your family. And I have a bipartisan bill to get that done.

Add your name today to be a grassroots co-sponsor of the Break Up Big Medicine Act. Together, we can show Congress that Americans are tired of paying more for worse care.

ADD YOUR NAME

Look, it's not just CVS.

If you use United Health Group for insurance, you may have had to deal with a pharmacy benefit manager called Optum RX, which is supposed to negotiate prescription drug benefits and decide which drugs are covered by United.

Guess who owns Optum RX? United Health Group. They also own Optum, which is a health services company.

Just as health care prices are set to spike this year following Trump's Big, Ugly Bill, this corporate consolidation ensures that a handful of companies are set up to profit even more.

When our bipartisan bill becomes law, companies that operate as one giant health conglomerate and violate the rules must comply within a year, and regulators, state attorneys general, and even private citizens can take action to enforce the rules.

For decades, policies have encouraged these mega-mergers, letting companies stack the deck to maximize profits while Americans pay more for worse care. We're finally taking steps to level the playing field.

Add your name today to be a grassroots co-sponsor of the Break Up Big Medicine Act.

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

 
fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

I’m teaming up with AOC to fix child care

Add your name if you want affordable childcare in every community
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle, I've been talking about the child care crisis for years.

Unaffordable child care almost kept me from pursuing my education and my career. I ran for president on this issue. I've introduced bill after bill to bring costs down. I've sat with parents and heard how they're juggling bills, rearranging shifts, and still barely making it work. And since then, the crisis hasn't stopped. It's deepened.

But we're still in this fight, and I'm continuing to address this critical issue alongside Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez with her leading my Child Care for Every Community Act in the House — and we're advocating for the Democratic party to prioritize reducing child care costs ahead of this year's midterms.

I'll share more below about our bill. And if you agree that Democrats must, must, must champion child care affordability in 2026, please add your name to sign on to this plan.

ADD YOUR NAME

During his reelection campaign, Donald Trump dismissed child care costs as "relatively speaking, not very expensive."

Relatively speaking?

Tell that to the parents paying thousands — sometimes tens of thousands — every year for care. Tell that to the mom who left her career because her entire paycheck went to daycare. Tell that to the grandparents draining their retirement trying to help out.

Here's what Trump won't say: Child care costs are crushing American families. And that's a policy failure, not a personal one.

For decades, Washington has treated child care as a private problem that families should simply "figure out." Heck, on the campaign trail JD Vance said one of the ways to help parents struggling with daycare costs was "Maybe, grandma and grandpa wants to help out a little bit more. Or maybe there's an aunt or uncle that wants to help out a little bit more."

Meanwhile, costs have skyrocketed, child care workers are paid poverty wages, and parents are left scrambling.

In the wealthiest nation on Earth, we've simply decided that affordable, high-quality child care is a luxury for the rich. We can't keep going like this. Here's what our bill will do:

  • Ensure that half of families pay no more than $10 a day for child care
  • Cap costs for most other families on a sliding scale based on income
  • Give our nation's child care workers a raise

And here's the thing: We already know a system like this works.

The U.S. military already provides affordable, accessible child care for service members through a sliding-scale program based on income. It demonstrates that with political will, we can make child care affordable and reliable.

What's more? This isn't theoretical — it's already happening.

New Mexico was the first state in the nation to offer no-cost universal child care for families, regardless of income.

In New York City, universal 3-K and Pre-K programs have expanded access to free early childhood education for tens of thousands of families.

And in San Francisco, voters approved a dedicated public funding stream to make child care more affordable and increase wages for providers.

These communities are reminding us that childhood should be a promise in America — not a privilege.

Add your name if you believe it's time to make affordable child care available in every community.

ADD YOUR NAME

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

 
fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.