Saturday, May 23, 2026

Donald Trump could nominate a total of five — yes, FIVE — justices on the Supreme Court

͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle, did you know that Donald Trump could appoint two more justices to the Supreme Court?

That would make five — yes, FIVE — justices on the Supreme Court that were nominated by Trump.

Right now, two of the oldest justices on the court — Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas — could retire at any moment.

And when they do, Donald Trump names their replacements. That could mean much younger and much more extreme MAGA Republicans who will be on that bench for decades.

We've already seen what happens when Trump picks justices. Roe v. Wade — gone. Voting rights — gutted. Worker rights — threatened.

Trump's justices have sided, over and over again, with extremists and giant corporations over working people. Now, imagine the damage they could do if there were two more of them?

What do we do about it? We take back the Senate. If Democrats have the Senate majority, we can block his extremist nominees. If Republicans hold the Senate, Trump gets a rubber stamp for any nominee he wants, no questions asked.

These midterms are critical. Not just for us, but for the kids who will inherit this country. For the grandkids who will grow up under the decisions this court makes. For the generations who come after that.

So I’m asking you to split a contribution today between our campaign and Demand Justice — they’re doing important, targeted work to reform our judiciary system and ensure that extremists don’t end up in our courts. Will you split a donation of $100 or anything you can to take back the Senate and stop the takeover of the Supreme Court?

 

If you've saved payment info with ActBlue Express, your donation will process automatically:

 
 

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.

Thursday, May 21, 2026

Add your name if you agree: The president should not be able to own and trade stocks. Or the vice president. Or members of Congress.

͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle,

I’m so sick of Donald Trump’s corruption.

I want to be focused entirely on the things that I know matter most to you: Lower prescription drug prices, better wages, and an economy that works for working people.

But it seems like every single day Trump is coming up with a new way to use the presidency to enrich himself rather than lower costs for you — and we need to call it out and fight back.

Between the frenzy of his $10 billion lawsuit against his own IRS, and the sham settlement that created a $1.8 billion slush fund to compensate January 6th insurrectionists, it was also reported that Trump has been astonishing Wall Street insiders with his trading activity.

In just the first three months of this year, Trump’s accounts made over 3,000 stock trades — roughly 60 trades every day the market was open.

He traded up to $680,000 in Eli Lilly while his administration shaped policies that could boost the company’s profits from its weight-loss drug.

He traded Nvidia — then approved the sale of advanced chips to China.

He bought stock in defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman — while the U.S. is in yet another war in the Middle East.

Trump is trading stocks in companies his administration impacts through policy. He's holding the stocks and pulling the levers that determine their value.

Looks like corruption. Plain and simple.

Bottom line: The president should not be able to own and trade stocks. Or the vice president. Or members of Congress. And we have a plan to ban this. If you believe presidents and politicians shouldn’t be allowed to own or trade stocks, add your name now.

ADD YOUR NAME

Every modern president before Trump has understood that holding individual stocks while running the country was a fundamental conflict of interest.

But truthfully, this isn't just a Trump problem.

Members of Congress have been doing a version of this for years.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are trading stocks in the very industries they regulate and the defense contractors they fund. Making suspicious trades right before major announcements. And facing little to no consequences.

I couldn’t think of a simpler way to restore the people’s trust in their government than banning stock trading by top government officials.

Let’s show that this plan has strong, public support: If you agree that presidents, vice presidents, and members of Congress should be banned from owning and trading stocks, add your name here.

Working families deserve a government focused on lowering costs and improving lives — not politicians treating public office like a personal investment strategy.

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

 
fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Kentucky

͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle, exciting news out of Kentucky:

Charles Booker is officially the Democratic nominee in the race to flip Mitch McConnell’s open Senate seat.

His campaign is fighting for big, structural changes: Passing universal child care, regulating AI & big tech, and a Medicare for All health care system.

He can flip this seat because he’s fighting like hell to make life more affordable for working people. Meanwhile, his Republican opponent just cares about impressing Trump.

But in order to win he needs a strong grassroots movement by his side. That’s why I’m asking you to split a contribution right now between Charles and our campaign — to start building on his momentum now and win big in November.

 

If you've saved payment info with ActBlue Express, your donation will process automatically:

 
 

Look, this race has been on the far-right’s radar. Elon Musk even poured $10 million into supporting a candidate earlier this year.

They know that they need to cling onto this seat to keep their power — and they’re willing to put up a strong fight.

But if we invest early into the critical organizing work needed to flip this seat, we can compete — and we can end McConnell’s legacy by electing an unapologetic, progressive leader like Charles.

Democrats have a real chance at taking back the Senate this November, and in order to do that we need to put up a strong offense in states like Kentucky. So will you split a contribution of anything you can today to support Charles Booker and our movement for big, structural change?

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

This is an insane level of corruption

͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle,

I’ve spent my career fighting against corruption. But what we’re seeing right now is unlike anything I’ve ever seen before.

Let me just catch you up on what just happened.

Donald Trump decided to sue the IRS — his own government that he runs — for $10 billion over the leaking of his tax returns during his first administration.

But just after a federal judge had ordered both sides to explain why the case didn’t create a massive conflict of interest — because Trump controls both the agency he sued and the lawyers defending it — this took a different turn.

His personal lawyers and his DOJ lawyers (remember they’re supposed to be on two different sides in this case) reached a sham settlement where the government agreed to create a $1.8 billion fund to compensate his political allies who believe they’ve been “wrongfully convicted,” potentially including the people who attacked the Capitol on January 6th.

All paid for by American taxpayers.

This level of corruption is staggering.

And it's why I introduced the Ban Presidential Plunder of Taxpayer Funds Act — legislation to make it illegal for a sitting president or vice president to receive settlement payments from the federal government they control — or to direct those payments to a third party.

Add your name if you want to help put an end to this corruption, stop politicians from rigging the system, and make sure taxpayer dollars are never treated like a personal slush fund again.

ADD YOUR NAME

Look, Trump used the threat of a lawsuit against his own government to pressure nearly $2 billion out of the U.S. Treasury.

No jury decided this. No judge approved it. Congress never voted on it.

It’s like Trump said: Nice lawsuit I’ve got here. Shame if someone had to keep defending against it… unless there was a payout for my allies.

And what makes this especially outrageous is how the fund was structured. Once the money is transferred, the government’s own order says it has “no liability whatsoever” for what happens next.

No accountability. No oversight. No clawback. Just $1.8 billion flowing into a fund controlled by Trump’s DOJ, to be distributed however they choose to Trump’s allies.

My legislation would ban presidents and vice presidents from collecting settlement payments from the government they control, require transparency and independent oversight, and impose real penalties for abuse.

This legislation draws a hard ethical line: Presidents cannot try to financially benefit from the very government they are controlling.

Add your name if you believe no president should be able to turn a sham lawsuit into a billion-dollar cash grab for political allies.

Thanks for being part of this,

Elizabeth

 
fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.

Saturday, May 16, 2026

Donald Trump's hand-picked Supreme Court took a sledgehammer to one of the most important civil rights laws in American history.

͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Warren for Senate

Danielle,

Donald Trump's hand-picked Supreme Court took a sledgehammer to one of the most important civil rights laws in American history.

They gutted the Voting Rights Act — allowing states to redraw maps that slice up diverse districts.

For instance: After their decision, Tennessee Republicans wasted no time in redistricting their House map to slice Memphis into three different districts.

Louisiana Republicans just advanced a map that eliminates a Democratic district.

And they lifted a mandate for Alabama to use a map with two majority-Black districts.

Let’s be clear about what this means: They're blatantly trying to silence Black voters to try and hold onto power.

We must fight back using every lever we’ve got. So I’m calling on Congress to step up and pass federal voting rights protections. I’m donating resources to states with races in 2026 so Democrats can win back our majorities. And I’m fighting for Supreme Court reform so we can root corruption out of the judiciary and expand the court.

But we’ve also got to make sure that state parties have the resources they need to fight back and defend disenfranchised voters.

So I’m asking you to make a split contribution to state parties in Alabama, Tennessee, Louisiana, and South Carolina. These are states that are fighting the immediate repercussions of this ruling — and who could use strong support right now.

 

If you've saved payment info with ActBlue Express, your donation will process automatically:

 
 

Thanks for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

fb tw ig yt

Paid for by Warren for Senate

All content © 2026 Warren for Senate, All Rights Reserved
PO Box 171375, Boston, MA 02117
This email was sent to danielle.davenport.blog@blogger.com
We'll miss you, but you can always unsubscribe.